I have seen both liberals and conservatives criticize Ron Paul for his stance on abortion. Liberals seem to think abortion should not be inhibited for any reason. Conservatives say Ron Paul shouldn't leave the decision up to the states. Some are against the day after pill.
To liberals, I used to be pro death: euthanasia, capital punishment, suicide, and abortion. Based on the Innocence Project I changed my mind on capital punishment, so did Ron Paul
I can also deal with only allowing the day after pill, which is Ron Paul's personal view. He expressed this on the Adam Curry Show, but he is not going to force that view on everyone.
Ron Paul supports the states making their own laws. I think the far left and the far right are both not dealing with reality.
To say life doesn't begin at conception is ridiculous. A one celled amoeba is alive. What matters here is, whether or not a nervous system has formed yet that can feel pain.
Partial Birth Abortion really is gruesome. If we are talking about a cluster of cells, I don't care. Partial birth abortion is dismembering a fetus once it has formed a nervous system that can feel pain. I don't think many people who support partial birth abortion actually know what it is.
Warning these links bring up gruesome pictures of partial birth abortion:
To conservatives who are against the day after pill, I always thought it's odd to be so against a child dying and going to heaven. Heaven is supposed to be well . . . heaven. It would be the mother who suffers judgment not the child. Everyone is supposed to have a purpose in life, but could the child's purpose be not being here very long? When many people think the world is going to hell and they can't wait for Revelation to take place, does it makes sense to objecting to preventing a cluster of cells from forming into a fetus?
Related Sites:
http://inflationtax.blogspot.com
http://causeoffreedom.blogspot.com
Military for Ron Paul meetup group
No comments:
Post a Comment